|
Post by treenail on Mar 22, 2007 10:20:19 GMT -5
Hi, This seems like the best place to ask this question. I make my living as an arborist, climbing trees professionally and recreationally too. Ever since I read the first edition of On Rope I began to realize that accessing trees on single rope was better than traditional arborist techniques. Over the years promoting SRT to arbos has been a minor passion of mine. Finally this has become more standard and accepted. Now...the question... The system that I use seems to be a hybrid. From the waist up it looks exactly like a Frog. But I use a single foot loop on the left, attached to the upper ascender and a Pantin on the right foot. When I ascend I don't 'Frog' it is more like a Ropewalker action using both feet. Another minor change that I made is to offset the chest ascender attachment. Using a delta on the right and a longer sling on the left allows the rope to tail straight into the Pantin. The small offset also makes the ropes a bit neater in front of my face. Is there a name for this setup? I started a thread on my arbo forum: tinyurl.com/2sxertThanks for any input...either here or at Treebuzz.com Tom
|
|
|
Post by madratdan on Mar 22, 2007 11:33:57 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum, Treenail. I use the same set up as you. I call it a frog with pantine assist. Maybe we could call it a Panfrogtine. ;D
|
|
|
Post by treenail on Mar 22, 2007 12:16:50 GMT -5
Pantin means puppet in French....you've got me thinking...Frog Puppet, how does that play?
Or, "Legless Frog" since the upper is Frog but the lower...well. they're on the menu tonight with garlic butter...
|
|
|
Post by tncaveres on Mar 22, 2007 14:14:34 GMT -5
One of the ladys in our group sunday was climbing with that system. I thought about trying it out.
|
|
|
Post by Sharon Faulkner on Mar 22, 2007 14:36:16 GMT -5
Isn't that set up what some folks are calling a Frog Walker?
|
|
|
Post by tncaveres on Mar 22, 2007 19:03:51 GMT -5
Sounds like a good name to me Oh yeah welcome to the site treenail
|
|
|
Post by Chad Dubuisson on Apr 14, 2007 11:15:31 GMT -5
Hi Tom, I too use the hybrid system you mention. The addition of the Pantin is a dream when starting out for pulling the rope down through the croll once you get the hang of kicking it up the rope. Sharon had asked: "is that what some people are calling a frogwalker?" I wanted to say that I remember reading in Alpine Caving Techniques , a French book on European SRT. In it, they talk about another Hybrid frog system that they call a "frog walker". In that system, you retain your croll in the normal position. The difference is that you reposition the upper ascender (and it helps to have a basic here!) below the croll. You short rig your foot cord to the stirrup part of your cord, so that you effectively create a knee-cam arrangement out of your foot cord. One then attaches a bungee cord from the back of the waist belt of the harness, up over one shoulder & back down all the way to the top of the new knee ascender. When rigged this way, one climbs very much like a rope walker, without the chest roller. Between the Pantin on the right foot & the knee cam on the left foot, you can simply reach up hand over hand & climb up the rope without too much effort. There's some friction in the rope channel of the croll, but it's not too bad. If anything, it's a different way to climb with a frog, it uses different muscles & allows the user to break up a long climb into a couple of different styles of movements & could be of use if someone started cramping really bad on a long climb, to be able to change things up & use different muscles.
|
|
|
Post by happykillmore on Apr 15, 2007 21:43:28 GMT -5
Outside my area of expertise , but how about the panting frog system.
|
|
|
Post by treenail on Apr 17, 2007 22:06:53 GMT -5
"Panting Frog" is cute Verticaver, The setup that you describe is interesting. Tomorrow I'm going to muddle around with it. One concern that I have is that the 'knee' ascender is below the climber's waist. This would not be a good place to have a backup attachment point. For tree climbers I think it's a good idea to have to attachments for ascent. Ropes can be directed over limbs and through brush. If something got into a mechanism causing a failure it could lead to a fall, maybe not a grounder, but a fall.
|
|
|
Post by John Lovaas on Apr 18, 2007 7:57:03 GMT -5
Hi Treenail-
I was thumbing through my copy of Alpine Caving Techniques(2002), and realized that they discussed your setup(minus the Croll displacement) as "Frogging with a foot ascender" or "The New French Method". The authors mention that the addition of the foot ascender had become more and more popular since the early 1990s..
They discuss using the system as a standard sit/stand, as well as symmetric and asymmetric stepping patterns. There's a Pantin on my gear wish list.
jl
|
|